On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 11:27:04AM -0400, Greg Sabino Mullane wrote: > On Sat, Apr 13, 2013 at 11:07:21AM -0400, Mitchell Perilstein wrote: > > Hi Greg, We haven't tried that isolation level yet but we were > > using our preferred 'read uncommitted' for a while (yes we know it's > > supposed to be the same as 'read committed' in pg) and that didn't > > seem to affect the lock usage or the memory complaints versus > > serializable. > > Hmmm... I think I meant "repeatable read". I need to revisit this > when my brain is not fuzzy. I don't think we should have > read_committed or read_uncommitted in there at all!
Yeah, sorry - it should always be set to repeatable read or serializable. Where are you setting it to read uncommitted? -- Greg Sabino Mullane [email protected] End Point Corporation PGP Key: 0x14964AC8
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Bucardo-general mailing list [email protected] https://mail.endcrypt.com/mailman/listinfo/bucardo-general
