Thanks for the kind reply. I need some help here. Failed to add sync: DBD::Pg::st execute failed: ERROR: Table "public.ir_model_relation" must specify a primary key! at line 117. at line 30.CONTEXT: PL/Perl function "validate_sync" at /usr/local/bin/bucardo line 3885. Weird? In rubyreps, I can actually temporarily create a virtual primary key (which doesn't impact changes to the actual table) config.include_tables 'ir_model_constraint', :key => ['id']
Is there any way which I can achieve with bucardo? I am using an existing open source system. Thus changing their design is really a bad idea, after all there are total of 60 out of 400 tables which have no primary keys. Any help? Thanks. > Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2013 21:17:20 -0600 > From: [email protected] > To: [email protected] > CC: [email protected]; [email protected] > Subject: Re: [Bucardo-general] Can bucardo do this? > > On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 06:24:12PM -0700, Rosser Schwarz wrote: > > As for your question about Bucardo's stability, there are people using > > 4.99.x in production right now. There's always the possibility of > > as-yet undiscovered bugs it is a beta release, after all but it hasn't > > eaten anyone's data yet that I'm aware of... > > Even if it weren't called a beta release, there's a possibility of finding > as-yet undiscovered bugs </pedant> But Rosser is certainly right. 4.99 is in > use in quite a few places, and your description doesn't suggest you'll be > doing anything that would tax Bucardo especially. > > -- > Josh Tolley [email protected] 801-987-0252 > End Point Corporation http://www.endpoint.com
_______________________________________________ Bucardo-general mailing list [email protected] https://mail.endcrypt.com/mailman/listinfo/bucardo-general
