On Wed, Dec 04, 2013 at 07:38:22AM -0500, Jonathan Brinkman wrote: > I agree this is a huge problem. I have a master with 20 slaves in a dbgroup, > using bucardo 4.5, and if any one of the slaves goes offline then ALL syncs > break, even those that have nothing to do with the missing slave or that > dbgroup. This seriously undermines the value of bucardo... and it is very > uncomfortable explaining to our clients why all the syncs are stopped until > someone goes to fix the offline slave server. > > Is this fixed in bucardo 5?
No, it is not fixed in B5. It's on the radar, but limited resources means I will get to it as some point, but I don't know when that will be. Here's a quick solution overview to kick around: * We already handle the cases where the ctl and kid lose connection to a server - they just respawn * If the MCP loses connection to a server, the action depends on a few things: - If that server is used as a source, we deactivate all syncs using it as a source. - If the server is only used as a target, we drive on (if a new flag is set), assuming there are other targets. If it is the only target, we deactivate the sync. - Periodically we try to reconnect to the downed servers. Once up, we reactivate the sync and/or add the server back as a target. -- Greg Sabino Mullane [email protected] End Point Corporation PGP Key: 0x14964AC8
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Bucardo-general mailing list [email protected] https://mail.endcrypt.com/mailman/listinfo/bucardo-general
