On Tue, Jun 02, 2015 at 12:20:23PM +0200, sym39 wrote: > Is it a way that a sync continues to be active even if one > referenced machine is down? The same problem is related in some old > posts, so I fear it is a well known problem.
It is a well known problem, with no easy solution. Proposals welcome. Perhaps we should start a new thread and I can lay out some of the technical difficulties? > Is it possible to use a dedicated pgbouncer with bucardo that will > only be used by bucardo. This may reduce the number of postgres > instances. It's possible, if done carefully, but of limited benefit, as Bucardo needs active, serializable, concurrent transactions most of the time. You may get more benefit by having the KID and CTL processes exit when done, by setting kidsalive=0 and stayalive=0 for each sync. -- Greg Sabino Mullane [email protected] End Point Corporation PGP Key: 0x14964AC8
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Bucardo-general mailing list [email protected] https://mail.endcrypt.com/mailman/listinfo/bucardo-general
