On Fri, Nov 06, 2015 at 07:35:37AM -0700, Jon Jensen wrote: > That's missing seconds, though, which are pretty important. :) I think you'd > want:
Thanks! Obviously I wrote that in haste. > I'm guessing that the varchar version would take way more disk space, and > the index would be way bigger and slower. > > So I too wonder whether a composite 2-field primary key would be better. > > For the sake of completeness do we need to discuss the likelihood of getting > the same PID at the same microsecond from two different machines? :) I don't think so. These come from the forked backend, and on the same machine, so there is no way they can have the same PID. -- Greg Sabino Mullane [email protected] End Point Corporation PGP Key: 0x14964AC8
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Bucardo-general mailing list [email protected] https://mail.endcrypt.com/mailman/listinfo/bucardo-general
