On Wed, 5 Jun 2024 13:21:20 GMT, Alan Bateman <al...@openjdk.org> wrote:

>> Severin Gehwolf has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a 
>> merge or a rebase. The pull request now contains 113 commits:
>> 
>>  - Mark some tests with requiring packaged modules
>>  - Correctly set packaged modules default
>>  - Merge branch 'master' into jdk-8311302-jmodless-link
>>  - Merge branch 'master' into jdk-8311302-jmodless-link
>>  - Fix new line in jlink.properties
>>  - Merge branch 'master' into jdk-8311302-jmodless-link
>>  - Simplify JLINK_JDK_EXTRA_OPTS var handling
>>  - Only add runtime track files for linkable runtimes
>>  - Generate the runtime image link diff at jlink time
>>    
>>    But only do that once the plugin-pipeline has run. The generation is
>>    enabled with the hidden option '--generate-linkable-runtime' and
>>    the resource pools available at jlink time are being used to generate
>>    the diff.
>>  - Merge branch 'master' into jdk-8311302-jmodless-link
>>  - ... and 103 more: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/compare/64bbae75...0eb1e48d
>
>> [5fef297](https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/commit/5fef297ba999963d60452f098193d2cba33a941b)
>>  implements this.
> 
> I think it was surprising that --enable-runtime-link-image still included the 
> packaged modules so thanks for taking the feedback on this point.

Thanks for the review, @AlanBateman! Updates pushed.

> test/jdk/tools/lib/tests/JImageHelper.java line 38:
> 
>> 36:  * JDK Modular image iterator
>> 37:  */
>> 38: public class JImageHelper {
> 
> This is only usable in tests that use `@modules` to open 
> jdk.internal.jimage.*. It might be better  co-locate this with the jlink 
> tests for now. It may be that we do have test infra structure for jimage in 
> the future but starting out with the supporting test lib in the jlink test 
> tree should be okay.

Sure.

-------------

PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/14787#issuecomment-2150589379
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/14787#discussion_r1628156069

Reply via email to