No issues with removing but we should see what the protocol spec says :-)

On Sat, Sep 20, 2014 at 2:33 AM, Jérôme LELEU <lel...@gmail.com> wrote:

> +1 to remove as well
>
> Jérôme LELEU
> Founder of CAS in the cloud: www.casinthecloud.com | Twitter: @leleuj
> Chairman of CAS: www.jasig.org/cas | Creator of pac4j: www.pac4j.org
>
> 2014-09-19 23:39 GMT+02:00 Misagh Moayyed <mmoay...@unicon.net>:
>
>> +1 to remove.
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Marvin Addison [mailto:marvin.addi...@gmail.com]
>> Sent: Friday, September 19, 2014 12:02 PM
>> To: cas-user@lists.jasig.org
>> Subject: Re: [cas-user] This is embarassing
>>
>> > Can anyone give me one good reason to keep that check box?
>>
>> I'm pretty sure you've given us a good executive summary for removing it.
>> :)
>>
>> In any case, while your experience sounds particularly bad, we've had some
>> headaches supporting extended flows while maintaining proper function of
>> the
>> warn feature. Ticket expiration like you noted is the main concern. It's
>> probably best to simply remove it; nobody here uses it either. Arguably
>> nobody _any_where.
>>
>> M
>>
>> --
>> You are currently subscribed to cas-user@lists.jasig.org as:
>> mmoay...@unicon.net To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives,
>> see
>> http://www.ja-sig.org/wiki/display/JSG/cas-user
>>
>> --
>> You are currently subscribed to cas-user@lists.jasig.org as:
>> lel...@gmail.com
>> To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives, see
>> http://www.ja-sig.org/wiki/display/JSG/cas-user
>>
>
> --
> You are currently subscribed to cas-user@lists.jasig.org as: 
> scott.battag...@gmail.com
> To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives, see 
> http://www.ja-sig.org/wiki/display/JSG/cas-user
>
>

-- 
You are currently subscribed to cas-user@lists.jasig.org as: 
arch...@mail-archive.com
To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives, see 
http://www.ja-sig.org/wiki/display/JSG/cas-user

Reply via email to