Hi Mohammad, I guess if you aren't in a position to get your SP's account manager to want to keep a ~300 site customer happy and you cant get an alternate provider, perhaps if you can handle the MTU impact of the additional tunnels, could you look at tunnelling over the SP network building a hub and spoke topology using something like DMVPN? It's not really covered in the R&S blueprint and falls under the Security banner if you want to read up on it.
Cheers, Adam On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 8:48 PM, Mohammad Moghaddas <[email protected]>wrote: > Hi. > > We have 290 sites over an MPLS cloud having IP reach-ability to each other. > The topology is as below: > > different VRFs<--site1--PE1---"P routers" ---PE2---site2-->different VRFs > > So the provider has established the connectivity between all sites. > > As the topology, we have different networks on each site, and each network > requires isolated routing-table and connectivity to the same VRF on the > other sites. > Unfortunately the provider's policies doe not allow having sub-if to PEs > and having eBGP to PE and exchange our VRFs' labels and the routing table. > I mean that they just only provide the base connectivity to other sites > without any isolation between our local VRFs. > I should point that our topology is Hub'n'Spoke. So I imagined implementing > one tunnel from each site for each VRF to the hub. I know that this not an > efficient way. > > So, what's your opinion? > > Best Regards, > M. Moghaddas > _______________________________________________ > For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please > visit www.ipexpert.com > > Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out > www.PlatinumPlacement.com > > http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_rs > _______________________________________________ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_rs
