Nice..  how did you do that?

 


 
Scott Hardesty | Cisco Engineer | MidAtlantic | Presidio Networked Solutions
7601 Ora Glen Drive, Suite 100, Greenbelt, MD  20770 | mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
D: 301.313.2041 | C: 443.789.1219 | http://www.presidio.com/

 
________________________________


From: Jonathan Charles [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Sunday, September 07, 2008 6:14 PM
To: Cardwell, Mark
Cc: Hardesty, Scott; ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] fastbusy on unallocated number

 

I actually wanted to do it using the Annunciator and I figured it out...
basically hacked the Annunciator to do it, but got it to play a custom
prompt...



Jonathan

On Sun, Sep 7, 2008 at 4:40 PM, Cardwell, Mark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:

 One otherway to do this is to create a CTI RoutePoint of 18XX forward
all to VM. On Unity create a call routing rule (Forwarding) of 18** and
route to a Call handler that plays what ever message you want it to
play.



Mark Cardwell | Systems Engineer | MidAtlantic | Presidio Networked
Solutions
7601 Ora Glen Drive, Suite 100, Greenbelt, MD  20770 |
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
D: 571.225.0132 | http://www.presidio.com/



-----Original Message-----

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Hardesty,
Scott
Sent: Sunday, September 07, 2008 11:20 AM
To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com

Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] fastbusy on unallocated number

 Johnathan, I worked through this scenario last night. I don't think
Unity has an "un-allocated" number prompt/greeting.  I created a
translation pattern of 18XX and a CTIport x1995(dummy phone)that was
forwarded to voicemail.

Created a call routing rule in Unity to send calls forwaded from 1995 to
a call handler named unknownNumber.  The call handler would then play
the prompt that you recorded.




Scott Hardesty | Cisco Engineer | MidAtlantic | Presidio Networked
Solutions
7601 Ora Glen Drive, Suite 100, Greenbelt, MD  20770 |
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
D: 301.313.2041 | C: 443.789.1219 | http://www.presidio.com/


-----Original Message-----

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, September 07, 2008 10:53 AM
To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: CCIE_Voice Digest, Vol 31, Issue 34

Send CCIE_Voice mailing list submissions to
       ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
       http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_voice
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
       [EMAIL PROTECTED]

You can reach the person managing the list at
       [EMAIL PROTECTED]

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of CCIE_Voice digest..."


Today's Topics:

  1. ICD Extension Not Showing Up (Devildoc)
  2. Re: Fast busy on unallocated number (Jonathan Charles)
  3. Re: Failed GK Calls to IPCC Services (Jonathan Charles)


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Message: 1
Date: Sun, 7 Sep 2008 07:37:10 -0700
From: Devildoc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] ICD Extension Not Showing Up
To: CCIE Voice Online Study List <ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com>
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"


I know there was a post on here a while back that has the solution to
restart a certain IPCC Express service to have the ICD extension showing
up when you try to associate a user to an ICD resource.  Does anyone
know what's the service name?  I can't find it anywhere.  It's not the
CRS Engine service because i restarted that service and the ICD
extension still didn't show up.  Thanks.

JD
_________________________________________________________________
See how Windows connects the people, information, and fun that are part
of your life.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/msnnkwxp1020093175mrt/direct/01/
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://onlinestudylist.com/pipermail/ccie_voice/attachments/20080907/b6a
7f65a/attachment-0001.html
<http://onlinestudylist.com/pipermail/ccie_voice/attachments/20080907/b6
a7f65a/attachment-0001.html> 

------------------------------

Message: 2
Date: Sun, 7 Sep 2008 07:52:55 -0500
From: "Jonathan Charles" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Fast busy on unallocated number
To: "Paul and Bobs" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Message-ID:
       <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"

Create a translation pattern that translates 18XX to 2000 and have 2000
as
DNIS in Unity call routing to go to a CH that says not allocated...


Jonathan

On Sun, Sep 7, 2008 at 3:27 AM, Paul and Bobs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:

> If my system is setup with teh following DID number range
>
> 617 302 1XXX
>
> and I only have DN setup for
>
> 617 302 10XX
>
> when someone tries to call a number with my range but that has not
been
> allocated they get fast busy
>
> 617 302 1800
>
> What I would like to try and do is create perhaps a CTI RP with DN
>
> 18XX
>
> and put a Call-Forward-All on this to voicemail, and try to get Unity
to
> say somethings like
>
> this numebr is not available at this time
>
> .....I am not sure what standard messages unity has.
>
> Does anyone have any ideas on this.
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://onlinestudylist.com/pipermail/ccie_voice/attachments/20080907/07a
a1569/attachment-0001.html
<http://onlinestudylist.com/pipermail/ccie_voice/attachments/20080907/07
aa1569/attachment-0001.html> 

------------------------------

Message: 3
Date: Sun, 7 Sep 2008 08:31:08 -0500
From: "Jonathan Charles" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Failed GK Calls to IPCC Services
To: Devildoc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: CCIE Voice Online Study List <ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com>,
       Christian Hennrich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Message-ID:
       <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"

So, basically what we said initially.... CSS on translation pattern...


Jonathan

On Sun, Sep 7, 2008 at 8:16 AM, Devildoc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:

>  The reason why it worked when i changed to 4 digits was because i had
my
> GK translation patterns in their own partition called pt-gk and the
internal
> DNs in their own partition called pt-internal.  So when I configured
the GK
> trunk to accept the 10 digits, I only gave its CSS access to pt-gk and
not
> the pt-internal.  But when i configured it to accept 4 digits, the
trunk
> didn't need to access any GK translation patterns, and therefore, I
gave it
> access to pt-internal directly.
>
> JD
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Date: Fri, 5 Sep 2008 15:27:25 -0500
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Failed GK Calls to IPCC Services
> CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
>
>
>
> Wait... why would it work when you changed the number of received
digits
> then?
>
>
>
> Jonathan
>
> On Fri, Sep 5, 2008 at 3:25 PM, Devildoc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> Christian,
>
> Yes, you're right.  I just labbed it up today and it worked!  The GK
trunk
> must have CSS access to the partition of the CTI route points.  The
issue is
> not the CSS of the translation pattern.  It's the CSS of the GK trunk.
It's
> so weird that it's working that way.  I wonder if there is any tool
that you
> can help you debug the communication to see what's going on at the
lower
> layers.
>
> Normally, i would configure the GK trunk to accept only 4 digits.
However,
> due to stringent requirements that mandate call routing from BR2
phones to
> the HQ and BR1 PSTN area code numbers (i.e any number in 212xxxxxxx
and
> 617xxxxxxx) via the GK trunk, I had to configure the trunk to accept
10
> digits.  If I configured only 4 significant digits, then that would
break
> the requirements.
>
> Anyway... that was an easy fix.  All I had to do was... added the
internal
> partition to the CSS of the GK trunk, and that fixed the issue.  Thank
you
> for you help.
>
> JD
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Date: Fri, 5 Sep 2008 08:20:03 +0200
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> CC: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
> Subject: AW: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Failed GK Calls to IPCC Services
>
>
>
>  Yes the CTI Ports need to be directly reachable by the Gateway CSS,
> without invoking the css of the translation pattern. You can use the
> translation pattern, but then use simply a css which is the same for
the
> gateway and the translation pattern.
>
> Hopefully Vik or Marc could explain, why this is special for CTI Ports
and.
>
>
> Cheers
>
>
>  *Von:* [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] *Im Auftrag von *Devildoc
> *Gesendet:* Donnerstag, 4. September 2008 23:14
> *An:* Christian Hennrich
> *Cc:* CCIE Voice Online Study List
> *Betreff:* Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Failed GK Calls to IPCC Services
>
>
> Christian,
>
> So you are saying that if the CSS of the GK-controlled trunk does not
have
> access to the CTI ports partition, then the call would fail?  That
makes
> sense because my GK-controlled trunk only has access to the GK
partition
> which the  translation patterns belong to.  The translation patterns
have
> CSS that could access the internal partition which the CTI ports
belong.  So
> in this scenario, my trunk uses the translation pattern as the middle
man to
> reach the CTI ports which the trunk does not have direct access to.
>
> I'll lab it up tomorrow to reconfigure my trunk to have access to the
> internal partition and see if that resolve the issue.  Thanks for
help.
>
> JD
>
> > Date: Thu, 4 Sep 2008 21:48:03 +0200
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > CC: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
> > Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Failed GK Calls to IPCC Services
> >
> > Hi JD,
> >
> > Jonathan is correct, it works for normal phones, but for CTI ports,
this
> > is special. cti ports need to be in the gateway cti ports.
> >
> > I do not why, but cti ports are not reachable, if they reside only
in
> > the css which the translation patterns uses, but not in the gateway
css.
> >
> > I had this often before on customer installations. This also happens
> > whit CUE CTI Ports. That is the reason why I also prefer and advise
to
> > use the significant digits and the prefix on the gateway.
> >
> > Cheers
> >
> > Devildoc schrieb:
> > > CSS is not the problem here. All of my CTI ports belong to the
same
> > > internal partition as with the rest of my phone extensions, and I
> > > could make calls from BR2 to HQ phones via the same GK trunk
without
> > > any issue. Calls from BR2 to any extension, route pattern or
> > > translation pattern in HQ and BR1 worked through the GK trunk,
except
> > > for these IPCC services DNs.
> > >
> > > If you have an opportunity to lab it next time, then please do and
see
> > > if you have the same problem that i have.
> > >
> > > JD
> > >
> > >
> > >
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >
> > > Date: Thu, 4 Sep 2008 10:56:13 -0500
> > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Failed GK Calls to IPCC Services
> > > CC: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
> > >
> > >
> > > OK, let's do this in sequence.
> > >
> > > First off, since you are accepting 10-digits, that means basically
all
> > > of em (cuz you are actually sending only 6 in this instance).
> > >
> > > So, the problem must be the translation pattern.
> > >
> > > Do you have a specific CSS on the trunk for inbound, which can see
the
> > > translation pattern? I presume you do.
> > >
> > > First thing to check is the CSS of the translation pattern, can it
see
> > > both the CTI RP AND the CTI Ports (as the call will hit the CTI RP
and
> > > then get transferred to the CTI Port).
> > >
> > > The problem with your solution is that you will break many other
> > > components (Teho, etc...)
> > >
> > >
> > > Jonathan
> > >
> > > On Thu, Sep 4, 2008 at 9:35 AM, Devildoc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote:
> > >
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > For some reasons, calls from BR2 into IPCC Express services (i.e.
> > > AA and ICD) located in HQ failed via the GK-controlled trunk if
> > > the trunk is configured to accept 10 digits for incoming and use
> > > the translation pattern with predot to discard the extra digit and
> > > deliver only 4 digits to the IPCC Express services trigger
> > > number. The IPCC Express service trigger number would ring twice
> > > before giving me a busy status and a reorder tone. However, if
> > > the trunk is configured to accept only 4 incoming digits, then the
> > > call goes through successfully. All configuration stays the
> > > same. The only difference is the number of incoming digits
> > > accepted by the GK trunk.
> > >
> > > For example, I configured IPCC Express service ICD with the
> > > trigger number of 1710. I also configured a GK and a
> > > GK-controlled trunk. The trunk was configured to accept 10
> > > incoming digits. I also had a translation pattern of 1#.[12]xxx
> > > with a discard predot. From BR2, I made a call to 1710 with a
> > > tech-prefix of 1#. The call got routed to the GK trunk which
> > > accepted all digits including the 1#. It then passed the 1#1710
> > > pattern to the translation pattern, which in turn stripped of the
> > > 1# and forwarded 1710 to the ICD trigger DN. The 1710 DN rang
> > > twice and then it stopped, and i got a busy status on my BR2 phone
> > > and a reorder tone. If I configured the GK trunk to accept only 4
> > > incoming digits and not using the translation pattern, then the
> > > call went through successfully without any issue.
> > >
> > > I was just wondering if i am the only one who has experienced this
> > > issue. Has anyone come across this issue before? Is this a bug
> > > or did i miss something in my configuration? Any help is greatly
> > > appreciated. Thanks.
> > >
> > > JD
> > >
> > >
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > Stay up to date on your PC, the Web, and your mobile phone with
> > > Windows Live. See Now
> > > <http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/msnnkwxp1020093185mrt/direct/01/>
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > Get more out of the Web. Learn 10 hidden secrets of Windows Live.
> > > Learn Now
> > > <
>
http://windowslive.com/connect/post/jamiethomson.spaces.live.com-Blog-cn
s%21550F681DAD532637%215295.entry?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_WL_getmore_092008
<http://windowslive.com/connect/post/jamiethomson.spaces.live.com-Blog-c
ns%21550F681DAD532637%215295.entry?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_WL_getmore_092008> >
>
> > >
> > >
______________________________________________________________________
> > > This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security
System.
> > > For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email
> > >
______________________________________________________________________
> > >
> > >
______________________________________________________________________
> > > This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security
System.
> > > For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email
> > >
______________________________________________________________________
> >
>
>  ------------------------------
>  Get more out of the Web. Learn 10 hidden secrets of Windows Live.
Learn
>
Now<http://windowslive.com/connect/post/jamiethomson.spaces.live.com-Blo
g-cns%21550F681DAD532637%215295.entry?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_WL_getmore_092008
<http://windowslive.com/connect/post/jamiethomson.spaces.live.com-Blog-c
ns%21550F681DAD532637%215295.entry?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_WL_getmore_092008> >
> ______________________________________________________________________
> This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
> For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email
> ______________________________________________________________________
>
> ______________________________________________________________________
> This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
> For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email
> ______________________________________________________________________
>
> ------------------------------
> See how Windows connects the people, information, and fun that are
part of
> your life. See
Now<http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/msnnkwxp1020093175mrt/direct/01/>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
> See how Windows connects the people, information, and fun that are
part of
> your life. See
Now<http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/msnnkwxp1020093175mrt/direct/01/>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://onlinestudylist.com/pipermail/ccie_voice/attachments/20080907/946
e0123/attachment.html
<http://onlinestudylist.com/pipermail/ccie_voice/attachments/20080907/94
6e0123/attachment.html> 

------------------------------

_______________________________________________
CCIE_Voice mailing list
CCIE_Voice@onlinestudylist.com
http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_voice


End of CCIE_Voice Digest, Vol 31, Issue 34
******************************************

 

Reply via email to