***  For details on how to be removed from this list visit the  ***
***          CCP4 home page http://www.ccp4.ac.uk         ***


If you had read the posts from other people w.r.t. to this problem, you would know that this is most likely not Mr Swan's fault, but some hardware problem. I for example have also received multiple mail from other posters to the ccp4bb.

It would be very unfair to block Mr Swan's posts because of this.

And you would also know that 4 lines are enough in your procmail rules file in order to move these repeating message to /dev/null.

Tim

--
Tim Gruene
Institut fuer anorganische Chemie
Tammannstr. 4
D-37077 Goettingen

GPG Key ID = A46BEE1A


On Mon, 4 Dec 2006, Marius Schmidt wrote:

***  For details on how to be removed from this list visit the  ***
***          CCP4 home page http://www.ccp4.ac.uk         ***


COULD SOMEONE from the ccp4bb PLEASE DELETE M.K. SWAN's PRIVILEGE TO
ENTER THE bb.
I CANNOT STAND THAT UNBEARABLE EMAIL ANYMORE.

Marius


Hi All,
I have a question about processing in HKL2000.
I have a dataset which looks like it will go out to 2.5A but the
problem
is that when I have integrated the 360 frames (180degrees) to 2.4A I
get
a large number of rejects on scaling which exceeds the 50000 limit.
So
is there any way to increase this limit or another method of reducing
the number of rejects?
I can get scaling to work if I either cut the resolution down to 3.0
or
lower but alternatively if I exclude alot of frames and leave say 90
then the rejects are below 50000 and the scaling produces data that
looks good to at least 2.6-2.5A according to the I/sigma and an
Rmerge
<0.5 in the final shell, however the completeness suffers due to the
low
number of frames.
I should also say that I am suspicious that one of the reasons for
all
the rejects might be that in the centre of the pattern the spots are
of
a good radial shape but towards the edge they become more elongated.
I
tried using the elliptical spot feature of HKL2000 but this doesn't
seem
to be ideal as the spots are not always elongated in the same
direction.
Any thoughts or suggestions would be much appreciated,

Mike Swan.

PD Dr. habil. Marius Schmidt
Physikdepartment E17
Technische Universitaet Muenchen
James Franck Strasse
85747 Garching/Germany
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
phone: +49-(0)89-2891-2550
fax:   +49-(0)89-2891-2548

Reply via email to