The issue I would raise here is not just for coot, but also for PDB format
itself. Last time I asked on ACA2011, Dr. Berman said polysacchride
residues in PDB is still not yet uniformly represented.

The issue I have is to polysacchride chains refinement in general, but
here more specific about branch chain of polysacchride chains. For
example, if you think about the case of N-glycosylation
Asn-NAG-beta1,4-NAG-beta1,4-Man-(alpha1,3-Man)-alpha1,6-Man ...

Now you have a branch chain, Now if I assume the following resseq
ASN A135
NAG A500
NAG A501
MAN A502
MAN A503
MAN A504

In my coot, version 0.6 revision 2540, You will be able to refine
A500-A503 as a whole since they are consecutive in resseq. But when I need
to refine NAG A500 together with ASN A135 locally, simply specify the
range is not enough, I need to specify a small radius to get it work, even
though the covalent link is defined in LINKR record. The same applies when
I want to refine just A502-A504 alpha1,6 glycosidic bond without refine
A503.

I am just wondering what is the state of the art for branch chain handling
in coot or another interactive refinement program.

best regards,
Heping Zheng


> On 22/11/11 00:16, Jan van Agthoven wrote:
>> Hi everyone!
>> Does anyone know if there is a way of auto-refining a sugar in Coot?
>>
>
> Such a tool (if I understand correctly what you want) does not yet
> exist. However, I believe that things are not in as poor a state as one
> might infer from other posts.
>
> Using the pre-release, you can
>
> 1) ideally position a NAG onto ASN
> 2) use multi-residue torsion to position a NAG by rotation of ASN chi
> angles
> 3) use the Ligand builder to build new carbohydrate monomers (it is my
> experience that PRODRG respects the wedge bonds - but I have heard that
> this is not always the case)
>
> Using latest stable or later you can
>
> 4) multi-residue refinement (or sphere refine), which does a link
> analysis based on the coordinates of the residue selection (note that
> bonding atoms have to be within 3A to be considered a real glycosidic
> linkage)
> 5) add addition pseudo plane restraints to encourage ideal chair (in my
> experience, at low resolution or with poor density, carbohydrates tend
> to wander off and twist up without these)
>
> The JLigand-Coot interface has stalled a bit, but I hope should be
> available for the Study Weekend.
>
> The Refmac-Coot link-up using LINKR is under discussion with Garib and
> Eugene.
>
> I would recommend against making a synthetic disaccharide carbohydrate
> with PRODRG.
>
> Regards,
>
> Paul.
>

Reply via email to