I did the same search as above (Patrick). I am confused how with SHELX you can get 320 (when using SOFTWARE) and then when using TEXT only 130.
I get the same no's. If the word SHELX exists as follows SOFTWARE USED: SHELX the same "word" (SHELX) will be picked up when we do a text search as well (Its there in the remarks section under software !) But obviously NOT ! I can understand is "text search" gave a higher no but in this case "software" gives more entries. I can also understand if one PDB id is retuned for multiple searches but one keyword search (software or text) the same no must be returned. I am a bit confused in the big disparity in no's 130/320 In both cases WITHOUT software/text word for SHELX I get 552 1.0A X-ray structures of protein only. On Sun, Jan 25, 2015 at 5:57 AM, Kay Diederichs < kay.diederi...@uni-konstanz.de> wrote: > Two additions: > a) SHELXL accounts for 16 X-Ray depositions in 2014; 2 of them also use > Phenix. > b) one can select "Does NOT Contain:" instead of "Contains:". Excluding, > in this manner, SHELXL, Phenix, Refmac, Buster and CNS, one gets 12 > entries. These employ mostly CNX, but also coot (!), X-PLOR, PRIMEX (?), > and one more REFMAC (4OM5) which for some reason does not show up in the > earlier Refmac search. > This shows that the results must be taken with some caution. > > Kay >
