Elaborating on Phoebe's answer, the question to ask is : "is the structure good 
enough to support the conclusions reached in the paper" ?
That is, quoting the abstract : "an unusual overall architecture that allows it 
to adopt a conformation that appears to facilitate pairwise cooperative binding 
to adjacent operator sites".

The answer is yes.

Another question could be: "does the structure provides an accurate picture of 
the structure, within a 0.2Å positional error". The answer is no. But then the 
authors made no such claim.

Thierry

From: CCP4 bulletin board [mailto:CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK] On Behalf Of Phoebe A. 
Rice
Sent: Thursday, April 23, 2015 12:46 PM
To: CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK
Subject: Re: [ccp4bb] 3BDN, 16.5% Ramachandran Outliers!!!!!

Dear Misbha,
  Before you throw stones at other peoples' work:
- have YOU tried to refine a structure at 3.9A, particularly with older 
software?
- there are many structures in the database that are related to lambda 
repressor.  Have you checked how the structure in question compares to those 
determined at higher resolution?  Is the overall fold the same?  Is the 
sequence register the same?  Remember that it is unreasonable to expect that 
all the side chain rotamers will be correct at 3.9A.
- When you looked at the actual electron density, what, exactly, did you see 
that suggested the structure may not be correct?
- The structure factors were deposited, so it should be easy for you to try 
re-refining it yourself with newer software, and see if it makes much 
difference to the final model.
- If you've gone through all those steps, and are still convinced that this 
structure is problematic, please do let the community know!


++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Phoebe A. Rice
Dept. of Biochemistry & Molecular Biology
The University of Chicago
pr...@uchicago.edu<mailto:pr...@uchicago.edu>
________________________________
From: CCP4 bulletin board [CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK] on behalf of Misbah ud Din 
Ahmad [misba.ah...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, April 23, 2015 11:03 AM
To: CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK<mailto:CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK>
Subject: [ccp4bb] 3BDN, 16.5% Ramachandran Outliers!!!!!
Dear crystallographers,

The PDB entry
http://www.rcsb.org/pdb/explore.do?structureId=3BDN
has 16.5% Ramachandran outliers. When I opened this PDB file in coot and 
checked for Ramachandran outliers, the results are:
In preffered region: 58.04%
In allowed regions: 19.78%
Outliers: 22.17%      !!!!!!!!!

With an R-free of 37.4% at 3.9 A resolution, could you please tell me how 
reliable this structure of Lambda repressor bound to DNA is?

Thanks
Misbha





Notice:  This e-mail message, together with any attachments, contains
information of Merck & Co., Inc. (2000 Galloping Hill Road, Kenilworth,
New Jersey, USA 07033), and/or its affiliates Direct contact information
for affiliates is available at 
http://www.merck.com/contact/contacts.html) that may be confidential,
proprietary copyrighted and/or legally privileged. It is intended solely
for the use of the individual or entity named on this message. If you are
not the intended recipient, and have received this message in error,
please notify us immediately by reply e-mail and then delete it from 
your system.

Reply via email to