I fully agree with Dale in not understanding what the problem is. Perhaps I have a better chance if you clearly explain what exactly you mean by "is there any way to better the B factors". Pavel
On Thu, Oct 13, 2016 at 12:57 PM, Dale Tronrud <de...@daletronrud.com> wrote: > I'm sorry but I don't understand what your problem is. Do you think > the B factors are too small for a 3A data set? A range of 70 to 75 is a > little smaller than usual but probably not out of bounds. > > Dale Tronrud > > On 10/12/2016 7:59 PM, sunanda williams wrote: > > Hi all, > > I have a structure at 3.0 A and R/Rfree of 24/28. The mean B value is > > around 98. The B value is especially high at the N terminus and two loop > > regions (around 120-150 AA). > > The rest of the structure averaged around 70-75. Has anyone faced such a > > scenario? How reliable is the structure and is there any way to better > > the B factors. > > Any help is appreciated. > > Thank you!! >
