Thanks everyone for answering the question! Best,
Wei On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 4:20 PM, Michael Martynowycz < michael.martynow...@gmail.com> wrote: > Wei, > > You can use the integrated integrated intensities only if you want to go > the ccp4 route. Sort the integrated reflections, then scale and truncate > them using: > > Pointless xdsin INTEGRATE.HKL hklout sorted.mtz > > Aimless hklin sorted.mtz hklout scaled.mtz > > Hope that helps. > > -Mike > > Sent from my iPhone > > On Nov 17, 2016, at 4:08 PM, Andreas Forster <docandr...@gmail.com > <docandr...@gmail.com>> wrote: > > Dear Wei, > > if you process your data with XDS, the best is probably to do the scaling > in XDS (CORRECT) and be done with it. If you want to use Aimless for > merging, you can turn off scaling with the ONLYMERGE keyword or use SCALES > CONSTANT. > > All best. > > > Andreas > > > > > On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 9:40 PM, Wei Wang <ww2...@columbia.edu> wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> Is there a way to let xds_par use less than all processors/threads on the >> machine? Sometimes I would like to process something else while XDS is >> running. >> >> Another question is related to the scaling procedure. My understanding is >> that the XDS already does the scaling during correction. So if I follow the >> XDS-Aimless route, then probably I should let Aimless do "skip scaling and >> only merge"? Please elucidate me on this issue. >> >> Regards, >> >> Wei >> > >
