Dear Flemming,

This would be an intellectual property dispute. A is cleaning that B has used 
his IP without agreement. Most universities (and I assume other organisations) 
have IP policies that protect staff from having there IP stolen; the IP 
nominally belongs to the institution so the theft is legally from A's 
institution. I suggest that the correct procedure would be for A to contact 
their department responsible for IP to pursue B for IP theft.

Universities are highly sensitive to reputational damage so B's institution are 
likely not to back B if there is a reputational risk. Theft of IP would 
constitute a high risk of reputational damage.

All the best,

Alun

Dr Alun R. Coker
Associate Professor
University College London Division of Medicine
The Rayne Building
5 University Street
London
WC1E 6JF

Tel: 020 7679 6703 Ext 46703
Web: www.ucl.ac.uk/pxmed<http://www.ucl.ac.uk/pxmed>




From: Mark J van Raaij
Sent: Wednesday 21 August, 09:12
Subject: Re: [ccp4bb] need someone officially settle a pdb dispute for a 
publication
To: CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


Dear Flemming,

As I understand it (I may be wrong), the final responsible institutions are 
those where the authors work. But as you say, they sometimes don't even reply - 
or they just may be very slow because they want to be really sure before 
committing to any answer.

But the journal has a responsibility also, to retract the paper if there is a 
serious suspicion the data were not obtained ethically. Of course, it may be 
difficult to prove ownership of a pdb file, if both authors claim ownership 
there is not really a way the journal can decide who is right. In my opinion, 
the journal should officially contact the institutions where the authors work 
to try and resolve this. The institutions may take the journal more seriously 
than a single researcher.

A generally respected institution that may advise on authorship disputes is 
COPE, Committee on Publication Ethics: 
https://publicationethics.org/<https://eur01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fpublicationethics.org%2F&data=02%7C01%7C%7Cff30200e84e54aca4f7408d7260f50c8%7C1faf88fea9984c5b93c9210a11d9a5c2%7C0%7C0%7C637019719533888373&sdata=QvZYG5V72vQU2HQuApB%2BjYJY%2FjZte2hDPBJALScpMvs%3D&reserved=0>
May also take a while though...
They have a database with anonymised examples of previously resolved disputes 
that may be helpful - you may find a similar situation on which they have 
"ruled". These are of course not legal rulings, but are considered by their 
members (most respectable journals) as a strong guideline.
This case may have similarities:
https://publicationethics.org/case/claim-stolen-data-and-demand-retractions<https://eur01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fpublicationethics.org%2Fcase%2Fclaim-stolen-data-and-demand-retractions&data=02%7C01%7C%7Cff30200e84e54aca4f7408d7260f50c8%7C1faf88fea9984c5b93c9210a11d9a5c2%7C0%7C0%7C637019719533898364&sdata=fIK7yCS9K2Vk6lojkkSQdpo2fVEpW9yDZPXdGFvL7u8%3D&reserved=0>

Best of luck,

Mark

Mark J van Raaij
Dpto de Estructura de Macromoleculas
Centro Nacional de Biotecnologia - CSIC
calle Darwin 3
E-28049 Madrid, Spain
tel. (+34) 91 585 4616


On 20 Aug 2019, at 17:45, Flemming Goery 
<flemming_go...@hotmail.com<mailto:flemming_go...@hotmail.com>> wrote:

Dear All,

A and B belong to 2 different institutes. A claimed B has used his pdb for a 
publication in Journal C. Journal C did not give the retraction, but permit 
complain related to the journal publication author issue, with the prerequisite 
journal C did not have the authority on authorship dispute. Then A has e-mailed 
to the institute head of B with academic misconduct by B as claim, the 
institute head of B did not give reply.

In this situation, can A have the journal  authorship  dispute settled by a 
neutral reviewer (Journal C view: you (A) need to reach out to the institutions 
that have authority to adjudicate on such matters, as investigation and 
adjudication on authorship claims falls outside the remit of journal editors. 
)? Who are qualified as the neutral reviewer so that the review decision can be 
submitted to Journal C?

If you believe you are qualified, or you know somebody or some organization 
qualified, please let me know and I will introduce the issue to you by separate 
e-mail (it is best not disseminated, am I right?)

Best regards.

Flemming


To unsubscribe from the CCP4BB list, click the following link:
https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/webadmin?SUBED1=CCP4BB&A=1<https://eur01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.jiscmail.ac.uk%2Fcgi-bin%2Fwebadmin%3FSUBED1%3DCCP4BB%26A%3D1&data=02%7C01%7C%7Cff30200e84e54aca4f7408d7260f50c8%7C1faf88fea9984c5b93c9210a11d9a5c2%7C0%7C0%7C637019719533898364&sdata=s6gdhcCw7GRINQp4C22X8JzALriiznlxRnmvt3gNLjw%3D&reserved=0>


To unsubscribe from the CCP4BB list, click the following link:
https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/webadmin?SUBED1=CCP4BB&A=1<https://eur01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.jiscmail.ac.uk%2Fcgi-bin%2Fwebadmin%3FSUBED1%3DCCP4BB%26A%3D1&data=02%7C01%7C%7Cff30200e84e54aca4f7408d7260f50c8%7C1faf88fea9984c5b93c9210a11d9a5c2%7C0%7C0%7C637019719533908360&sdata=fQrDCCKFSZJLXUVb%2BU%2BSkJ1dJquDu%2BkiMoApVLdHBXs%3D&reserved=0>



########################################################################

To unsubscribe from the CCP4BB list, click the following link:
https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/webadmin?SUBED1=CCP4BB&A=1

Reply via email to