> Dana wrote:
> I'm saying that intelligence *as measured in say the Stanford-Binet*
> is at least partially cutural.
>

"Intelligence" (whatever that is, but I would say capacity and speed
of learning) is 100% genetic and MAY correlate or be caused by other
genetic traits which could include skin color.

So back to Dr. Watson's comment: we have no idea if native *Africans*
(white, black, red ...) are, on average, less intelligent than Asians.
 Wouldn't surprise me a bit.  But then it also wouldn't surprise me if
Africans were smarter than Europeans.

This is mostly because I'm open and accepting to the idea that my
particular genetic grouping, whatever you'd like to define it as, is,
on average, dumber than most 4th graders.   Once you accept that,
nothing offends you.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Download the latest ColdFusion 8 utilities including Report Builder,
plug-ins for Eclipse and Dreamweaver updates.
http;//www.adobe.com/cfusion/entitlement/index.cfm?e=labs%5adobecf8%5Fbeta

Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/message.cfm/messageid:245354
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5

Reply via email to