On Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 10:17 PM, Michael Dinowitz < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 9:38 PM, Zaphod Beeblebrox < > [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Again, if you don't know how it impairs a woman you've never tried to > please > one and definitely are not one. You try masturbating without the proper > equipment. > > This is really a cheap shot that you've done several times. Suffice it to say that if the clitoris is the only thing you know to stimulate, then it's not me who's lacking knowledge. > > How do I say this without going into too much detail - If it can get > better > than how it is already then we would never find the time to do any work. > and you'll never know if it can be better will you....that choice was made for you. > > are you sure it's only helpful? > > Very few problem cases and very far between. If you could point out > mistakes > made on a daily, weekly or even monthly basis I'd say your argument had > some > merit, but.... > can you point to daily, weekly or monthly cases of people having problems with uncircumcised penises? If not, wouldn't your argument also loose merit since you're claiming health benefits? > Why is it that these countries all have circumcision rates above 75% > > Because circumcision has been shown to reduce AIDs risk and has been > pushed > heavily in Africa for these reasons. Of course places that have a > tradition > of circumcision will have a high percentage. > Shouldn't we be pushing condom usage vs circumcision in Africa then...."Hey baby, it's all right, I'm circumcised, you won't get AIDS, trust me!" > > > > While Europe and Asia are down below 25%.....Do you see a theme..... > > Do a correlation with the population growth and/or religious observance in > Europe and you may have something. Asia on the other hand doesn't have the > tradition so its numbers are not expected to be high. > That's my point! It's really all about the religion. It's a religious thing. The medical community is split on the necessity of the procedure. Since this country's main religions believe it's proper, it's acceptable to hack on an infant. One thing has me puzzled though.....since I'm not a believer in a superior being, from what I remember being told, God made us in his image. Why is it that the first thing we do when a new one of us is born is hack off a piece of skin and say "He didn't need this anyway" What is the dogma behind this tradition? > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to date Get the Free Trial http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;192386516;25150098;k Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/message.cfm/messageid:257817 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5
