but if none of those homosexual men had heterosexual sisters, then eventually it would die off. your essay, although well written seems to assume a lot and not look at the instances like what i described above.
-- tony Better than a thousand hollow words, is one word that brings peace. -- siddhartha gautama On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 1:11 PM, Gruss Gott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> gg wrote: >> It's also a great read before taking next evolutionary step (he he) in >> looking into some hypotheses on the holes in ToE here: >> >> http://www.amazon.com/Quantum-Evolution-Weirdest-Explains-Paperback/dp/0393323102/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1227203925&sr=1-1 >> > > Forgot to note the net-net which is that having children is not the > only mechanism that propels evolution and may, in fact, be a minor > one. > > As this pertains to homosexuals, it essentially says that they are as > natural (they're created by nature right??) and therefore "proper" as > any other creature and may be just as important to evolution as any > other creature. > > In other words, the argument that we all exist simply to procreate as > a method of driving evolution - at a minimum - has gigantic holes > based on the Theory of Evolution itself. > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to date Get the Free Trial http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;207172674;29440083;f Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:281059 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5
