Ah, so one mistake invalidates an entire project? I'm sure that the people you work for are happy to know that they don't have to pay you if anyone finds a bug in your code.
Judah On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 6:17 AM, Sam <sammyc...@gmail.com> wrote: > > I'm going to call that the Dan Rather defends. > > On Sun, Jan 24, 2010 at 7:26 PM, Judah McAuley <ju...@wiredotter.com> wrote: >> >> The claim that Himalayan glaciers would be all gone by 2035 was not >> supported by the evidence at hand. The claim should not have made it >> into the IPCC report. Everyone, as far as I'm aware, agrees on that. >> >> That being said, the Himalayan glaciers have been retreating for 5 >> decades (see the link I posted earlier) and there is evidence that the >> rate is increasing. So the original claim may not be supported well >> enough to make it into the IPCC report but it also isn't a spurious >> claim either. >> >> And the main point is that Robert's implication that the IPCC report >> is tarnished because of the inclusion of one statement that was >> erroneously included out of 3000 pages is a big crock of shit. >> >> Judah >> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Want to reach the ColdFusion community with something they want? Let them know on the House of Fusion mailing lists Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:311102 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5
