Wow. Jacobs sounds like an asshole. If he can't separate his personal distaste for the plaintiffs from the legal standing of their complaint, then he needs to recuse himself if the matter gets sent back to him.
The government's defense is that the plaintiffs can't sue because no one caught them in the act? Yeah, I don't think that has ever really worked in any indictment. That attitude makes it clear that the spirit of the law is being ignored and that the law is only thought of as something inconvenient that has to be worked around. On 5/22/2012 1:15 PM, Dana wrote: > > http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2012/05/supreme-court-to-decide-if-journalists-can-sue-over-warrantless-wiretaps/ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:351103 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm
