Read Day of Deceit by Robert B. Stinnett.  It contains all the radio
transcripts and documents and evidence I need to say this with some
certainty, they allowed it to happen.

Next you'll be telling me that the Gulf of Tonkin incident wasn't a false
flag operation.

On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 7:43 PM, Larry C. Lyons <larrycly...@gmail.com>wrote:

>
> I do not know whether you were being sarcastic or starting to wear a
> tinfoil hat. Seriously Tim that story has been debunked so long ago
> that its really in the black helicopter type of conspiracy. The
> Japanese IJN were planning the attack for at least a year and a half,
> probably longer. They sent several planning groups to look at the
> damage that the British raid on Taranto did to the Italian fleet. The
> US Navy could not have obliged them more. They dismissed radar
> reports. There were even some warnings a week ahead of the raid. The
> command (Kimmel et al., ) dismissed the possibility of an air raid,
> and thought the most likely attack was from local Japanese Americans.
> So to prevent sabotage, the aircraft were aligned up nicely down the
> middle of the tarmac. Unfortunately it made the aircraft very
> vulnerable to air attack. In the harbour same thing. Battleship row
> was great for ground security, and even more vulnerable than the
> Regina Marina in Taranto.
>
> So I really don't think it was  a Churchillian and Roosevelt
> conspiracy. The Japanese had almost the best navy at that point. If it
> were not for Midway and breaking the IJN codes they would have won the
> Pacific Theatre.
>
> On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 5:27 PM, LRS Scout <lrssc...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Even then Roosevelt and Churchill tricked us into the war through
> > conspiracy and allowing Perl Harbor to occur.  Pre-civil war.  Maybe the
> > civil rights era, but a suspicious man could have looked at that as an
> > attempt to expand certain voting blocks.
> >
> > On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 5:11 PM, Eric Roberts <
> > ow...@threeravensconsulting.com> wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> When was the last time we did the right or good thing?  WWII?
> >>
> >> Eric Roberts
> >> Owner/Developer
> >> Three Ravens Consulting
> >> ow...@threeravensconsulting.com
> >> http://www.threeravensconsulting.com
> >> tel:
> >> 630-881-1515
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: GMoney [mailto:gm0n3...@gmail.com]
> >> Sent: Tuesday, June 26, 2012 10:36 AM
> >> To: cf-community
> >> Subject: Re: Syria and Turkey
> >>
> >>
> >> On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 10:27 AM, Larry C. Lyons
> >> <larrycly...@gmail.com>wrote:
> >>
> >> >
> >> > and it is that attitude that contributes to what happened in places
> >> > like Somalia, Rwanda, Bosnia. The thing is that in the long run it
> >> > does affect you. Aside from the enlightened self interest here, why
> >> > not just do the right and good thing?
> >> >
> >>
> >> Because America always get's bitched-slapped for trying to do the right
> and
> >> good thing, and then Americans die, and then it escalates, and it turns
> >> into
> >> some 10 year clusterfuck. The path to hell truly is lined with good
> >> intentions. Then the politics start.....dems claimed Bush went into Iraq
> >> for
> >> oil or to get Cheney rich and republicans would claim Obama went into
> Syria
> >> looking for a political victory (the country rallies behind a war time
> >> president, especially a new war, with "good intentions")....and through
> it
> >> all...American soldiers keep dying.
> >>
> >> The world is full of bad people who like to kill each other. America
> can't
> >> change that, and I'm sick of trying.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
>
> 

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion
Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:352382
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm

Reply via email to