Once again no answer to my question regarding the stability of CFMX in a shared hosting environment!!
A lack of an answer leads me to beleive that it is in fact unstable and MM does not wish to comment on it. Yes I now this is not a MM list and I should not expect an official answer here. If the MM folks on this list feel this is the case, at least acknowledge me and tell me who to talk to at MM for an answer. Prove me wrong please ;-) Bryan Stevenson B.Comm. VP & Director of E-Commerce Development Electric Edge Systems Group Inc. t. 250.920.8830 e. [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------- Macromedia Associate Partner www.macromedia.com --------------------------------------------------------- Vancouver Island ColdFusion Users Group Founder & Director www.cfug-vancouverisland.com ----- Original Message ----- From: "Bryan Stevenson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, March 04, 2003 4:36 PM Subject: Re: ODBC Problems? > Mike, > > I would like to hear the official line from Macromedia regarding the > stability of CFMX in production environments...especially regarding shared > hosting. > > As I've posted before on this list (and I think you took the info from me to > follow up on it and never got back to me), a local ISP that upgraded to CFMX > had major issues and were eventually told by Macromedia tech support that > CFMX was not stable enough for shared hosting. > > So is this Macromedia's position or not? I'm not looking to point fingers > and start some kind of MM flame war or anything. I simply want to be able > to tell my clients the truth...no matter what it is. > > I personally love CFMX and especially love Flash remoting. No matter what > your answer is I will still use theses products (although I may not advise > clients to use CFMX if there are still issues). If there are issues, I will > simply wait until they are resolved before advising clients to use CFMX. Of > course if I get lied to and then incorrectly advise a client to use CFMX > I'll be one pissed CF developer ;-) > > BTW the "use proper channels" line is getting old. I don't think paying > customers should have to pay even more just to make MM's bug tracking system > work. Change the system so someone such as yourself can report a bug that > you see on lists. The bottom line should be making the product the best it > can be and NOT "following proper channels". > > Thanks for reading > > Cheers > > Bryan Stevenson B.Comm. > VP & Director of E-Commerce Development > Electric Edge Systems Group Inc. > t. 250.920.8830 > e. [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------- > Macromedia Associate Partner > www.macromedia.com > --------------------------------------------------------- > Vancouver Island ColdFusion Users Group > Founder & Director > www.cfug-vancouverisland.com > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Mike Chambers" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Tuesday, March 04, 2003 3:49 PM > Subject: Re: ODBC Problems? > > > > This is the reason we have those proper channels, such as tech support and > > the wish list. > > > > If you post an issue here, we may not see it, and if we do, we may not get > > the info needed, or have it logged correctly in the bug base. > > > > The people who monitor the wish list and tech support know what info to > ask > > for, and can log it properly in the bug base. > > > > So, if you don't want to use those channels, that is fine. But you should > > not expect to get one on one support from macromedia without going through > > those channels. > > > > mike chambers > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Joe Eugene" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Sent: Tuesday, March 04, 2003 6:39 PM > > Subject: RE: ODBC Problems? > > > > > > > > If the issue is a CFMX issue, then you do not have to pay anything. > > > > > > What else do u think it is?... I am not wasting my time on this > anymore.. > > > if you want... GO FIX YOUR PRODUCT (CFMX). Its quite obvious from other > > > posts here, CFMX is not production stable(continuous problems). When a > > > problem gets reported, MM Folks should atleast show the courtesy to > > > acknowledge the problem and try to fix it...NOT ask developers to go > > though > > > the proper channel. > > > > > > I am not the ONLY person that has complained about CFMX ODBX Problems, > > > others here have reported the problem as well. Switching to a JDBC > driver > > > is not the answer to CFMX ODBC problems. > > > > > > Joe Eugene > > > > > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > From: Mike Chambers [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > Sent: Tuesday, March 04, 2003 5:14 PM > > > > To: CF-Talk > > > > Subject: Re: ODBC Problems? > > > > > > > > > > > > If the issue is a CFMX issue, then you do not have to pay anything. > > > > > > > > mike chambers > > > > > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > > From: "Joe Eugene" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > Sent: Tuesday, March 04, 2003 4:38 PM > > > > Subject: RE: ODBC Problems? > > > > > > > > > > > > > Mike, > > > > > We dont have any support licences and as far as i know > > > > > to contact Tech Support we have to pay for the support. > > > > > > > > > > This is really a Macromedia Product (CFMX) Problem and we > > > > > are not willing to pay to resolve MM Product Problems. > > > > > Please let me know, if you can help. > > > > > > > > > > Thanks > > > > > Joe Eugene > > > > > > > > > > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribe&forumid=4 FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
