Eugene.Zelenko added inline comments.
================
Comment at:
clang-tools-extra/test/clang-tidy/checkers/readability/container-data-pointer.cpp:1
-// RUN: %check_clang_tidy %s readability-container-data-pointer %t -- --
-fno-delayed-template-parsing
+// RUN: %check_clang_tidy %s readability-container-data-pointer %t --
-config="{CheckOptions: [{key:
readability-container-data-pointer.IgnoredContainers, value: '::arrayType'}]}"
-- -fno-delayed-template-parsing
----------------
felix642 wrote:
> Eugene.Zelenko wrote:
> > I think test should be separated to handle situations with and without
> > option.
> Hi @Eugene.Zelenko,
>
> I'm not familiar with clang-tidy's testing environment. What do you mean
> precisely by "test should be separated"? Does it mean I should define this
> test in a different .cpp with the appropriate tests?
I meant that dedicated test for new check option should be created. But will be
good idea to expand original one, so difference in behavior could be observed.
Repository:
rG LLVM Github Monorepo
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D133244/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D133244
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
