================
@@ -0,0 +1,105 @@
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -verify=expected,omp45 -fopenmp -fopenmp-version=45
-std=c++11 -ferror-limit 200 -o - %s
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -verify=expected,omp50 -fopenmp -fopenmp-version=50
-std=c++11 -ferror-limit 200 -o - %s
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -verify=expected,omp51 -fopenmp -fopenmp-version=51
-std=c++11 -ferror-limit 200 -o - %s
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -verify=expected,omp60 -DOMP60 -fopenmp -fopenmp-version=60
-ferror-limit 200 -o - %s
+
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -verify=expected,omp45 -fopenmp-simd -fopenmp-version=45
-std=c++11 -ferror-limit 200 -o - %s
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -verify=expected,omp50 -fopenmp-simd -fopenmp-version=50
-std=c++11 -ferror-limit 200 -o - %s
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -verify=expected,omp51 -fopenmp-simd -fopenmp-version=51
-std=c++11 -ferror-limit 200 -o - %s
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -verify=expected,omp60 -DOMP60 -fopenmp-simd
-fopenmp-version=60 -std=c++11 -ferror-limit 200 -o - %s
+
+#ifdef OMP60
+struct ComplexStruct {
+ int data[10];
+ struct InnerStruct {
+ float value;
+ } inner;
+};
+
+typedef void **omp_impex_t;
----------------
abhinavgaba wrote:
What happens if we don't have a declaration of these types, e.g. if omp.h is
not included.
Should we test for that scenario? A similar scenario for reference would be
what happens with `uses_allocators(omp_default_mem_alloc)`, without including
omp.h.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/166810
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
