topperc wrote: > > `Also, because extensions Zba and Zbb are now assumed to be required for > > Base P, this version removes these scalar instructions that exist in Zba > > and Zbb: SH1ADD SEXT.B SEXT.H MIN MINU MAX MAXU REV8 CLZ CLZW` > > does is mean `P` implies `Zba` and `Zbb`? > > This is not a nice wording, but to me it does mean P implies Zba_Zbb. It > simply removes the overlap in anticipation that implementations will opt for > Zba and Zbb when P is implemented.d Better to double check on the mailing > list.
I agree we should ask on the mailing list. I don't think should block this PR. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/170399 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
