dbartol wrote:

@erichkeane 

> I think a better order: Add support for StableId, add explicit IDs, make 
> explicit StableId required for warnings/errors. I don't see any value to the 
> 'implicit' version in the meantime.

It's a bit more difficult to test the SARIF output without stable IDs. Without 
stable IDs, we were still using the integer value of the enum as the ID, which 
is obviously not stable, and had extra filtering in our tests to compensate. I 
don't think having the implicit stable IDs hurts anything in the short time it 
will take for me to write the update script and open the explicit stable IDs PR.


https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/168153
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to