On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 12:42 PM, Akim Demaille <a...@lrde.epita.fr> wrote:
>
> Le 11 nov. 2014 à 21:37, David Blaikie <dblai...@gmail.com> a écrit :
>
> > Fixed in r221704 - again, apologies for the breakage... :/
>
> Great, thanks!
>
> But...
>
> >> On Mon, Nov 3, 2014 at 8:32 AM, Akim Demaille <a...@lrde.epita.fr>
> wrote:
> >>
> >> Is there some work around, such as asking for less accurate
> >> debugging symbols with some magic compiler flags?
>
> Would you know such a means for pre-r221704?
>
Unfortunately not... :( Really sorry about that. You would have to avoid
this construct (in any context where the type might not be deduced
immediately - so any class template or an out of line definition of an auto
return type function). In those places you can still use a late return type
specification ("auto x() -> foo").
_______________________________________________
cfe-users mailing list
cfe-users@cs.uiuc.edu
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-users
