OK, I didn't see this because it wasn't attached to the ticket. I posted an alternate patch on #1014 which just addresses the "old data" problem in string->time. As far as I can tell, the various uses of C_tm can not interfere with each other and all one needs to do is initialize C_tm to a sane default just prior to calling strptime. Does that look correct?
On May 24, 2013, at 3:26 PM, Peter Bex <peter....@xs4all.nl> wrote: > Hi all, > > Attached is a bit of a nasty patch which slightly cleans up the even > nastier C macro hackery in posixunix/posixwin/posix-common. > > This fixes #1014, which was created by David Krentzlin today. > > I'd appreciate if someone could test whether this does not break > anything on Windows. The posixwin.scm change is pretty small, > but you never know :) > > Cheers, > Peter > -- > http://www.more-magic.net > <0001-Some-shuffling-about-and-fixing-of-the-POSIX-time-ha.patch>_______________________________________________ > Chicken-hackers mailing list > Chicken-hackers@nongnu.org > https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-hackers _______________________________________________ Chicken-hackers mailing list Chicken-hackers@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-hackers
