On Thursday 28 February 2008, Justin M. Streiner wrote: > Unless you need a brand-new feature, or need to support > brand-new hardware, T-train code should not be running on > a production router.
Agree. To hijack the thread some :-), we have a couple of boxes running 12.4 mainline due to some features we like in this code revision. However, implementing some BFD features in this train means we have to consider 12.4T (which we are very wary about). So it's either 12.4T or 12.2(33)SRC :-\. Mark.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
