> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jeff Cartier > Sent: Wednesday, May 21, 2008 11:08 AM > To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net > Subject: [c-nsp] Cisco WCL- 4402 - Max AP & LAG > > I've heard somewhere...and possibly read somewhere that in > order to get > the full 50 AP allotment out of a Cisco Wireless LAN Controller 4402 > model, 50 AP, you have to Port-Channel/LAG the two Gigabit ports > together.
Not correct, to my knowledge. We have the 4404 100 AP units and none of our channels are bonded. During the AP discovery process the controller assigns the AP to a given port to maintain distribution, so I can't see any reason why it would be necessary to have them bonded. Thanks, Josh _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
