RP/0/RSP0/CPU0:9K6-413#show run int tunnel-te 501 Thu Mar 29 23:38:02.719 UTC interface tunnel-te501 ipv4 unnumbered Loopback0 load-interval 30 autoroute announce !autoroute announce destination 10.100.100.3 fast-reroute path-option 10 explicit name 413-312 !
RP/0/RSP0/CPU0:9K6-413#show run int tunnel-te 502 Thu Mar 29 23:38:12.446 UTC interface tunnel-te502 ipv4 unnumbered Loopback0 load-interval 30 autoroute announce !autoroute announce destination 10.100.100.2 fast-reroute path-option 10 explicit name 413-405 ! ! explicit-path name 413-312 index 10 next-address strict ipv4 unicast 10.20.4.1 index 20 next-address strict ipv4 unicast 10.100.100.3 ! explicit-path name 413-405 index 10 next-address strict ipv4 unicast 10.20.3.1 index 20 next-address strict ipv4 unicast 10.100.100.2 ! if you need aditional outputs let me know... Thank you! On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 7:35 PM, Xu Hu <jstuxuhu0...@gmail.com> wrote: > Can share your configuration? Recently I was also configuring the MPLS TE > in asr9k. > > Thanks and regards, > Xu Hu > > On 30 Mar, 2012, at 8:28, omar parihuana <omar.parihu...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Hi Group, > > > > I'm wondering about a strange behaviour about MPLS TE on ASR9K > > > > I have two MPLS TE tunnels (with autoroute announce): > > > > RP/0/RSP0/CPU0:9K6-413#show route 10.100.100.7 > > Thu Mar 29 23:09:49.818 UTC > > > > Routing entry for 10.100.100.7/32 > > Known via "isis BACKBONE", distance 115, metric 140, type level-2 > > Installed Mar 29 22:58:29.392 for 00:11:20 > > Routing Descriptor Blocks > > 10.100.100.2, from 10.100.100.7, via tunnel-te502 > > Route metric is 140 > > 10.100.100.3, from 10.100.100.7, via tunnel-te501 > > Route metric is 140 > > No advertising protos. > > RP/0/RSP0/CPU0:9K6-413# > > > > In accordance to RIB output I was hopping that traffic to 10.100.100.7 be > > balanced between both tunnels... however I only see traffic over the > first > > tunnel... > > > > > > RP/0/RSP0/CPU0:9K6-413#show mpls forwarding prefix 10.100.100.7/32detail > > Thu Mar 29 23:05:13.320 UTC > > Local Outgoing Prefix Outgoing Next Hop > > Bytes > > Label Label or ID Interface > > Switched > > ------ ----------- ------------------ ------------ --------------- > > ------------ > > 16012 16014 10.100.100.7/32 tt502 10.100.100.2 > > 24438881830 > > Updated Mar 29 22:58:29.416 > > MAC/Encaps: 14/18, MTU: 9180 > > Label Stack (Top -> Bottom): { Imp-Null 16014 } > > Packets Switched: 100987115 > > > > 16018 10.100.100.7/32 tt501 10.100.100.3 > > 0 > > Updated Mar 29 22:58:29.416 > > MAC/Encaps: 14/22, MTU: 9180 > > Label Stack (Top -> Bottom): { 16020 Imp-Null 16018 } > > Packets Switched: 0 > > > > > > What's happening? why not load balancing ? do i need a additional conf on > > ASR9K in order to accomplish MPLS TE load balancing? > > > > > > Thank you for your answer... > > > > Rgds. > > > > > > -- > > Omar E.P.T > > ----------------- > > Certified Networking Professionals make better Connections! > > _______________________________________________ > > cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net > > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp > > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ > -- Omar E.P.T ----------------- Certified Networking Professionals make better Connections! _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/