On Aug 30, 2013, at 1:58 PM, Aaron <aar...@gvtc.com> wrote: > Why qos? Does it do any good IF links aren't congested? In other words, if > I don't have congestion, is there a reason for it? ...meaning that if I can > simply add fatter pipes (go from 1 gig to 2 gig etherchannel, or from 10 gig > to 20 gig etherchannel) then does fatter pipe solve all my qos problems? > Latency, delay, jitter, bandwidth needs solved with fatter pipes? > > In other words, if I have an sla requirement to provide one-way 5 ms delay > (nothing more or I'm in violation of sla), AND my interconnections > throughout my network are NOT congested (utilized at or above line rate) AND > I'm seeing ip sla probes reporting 200 ms latency will qos solve this?
Congestion management and congestion avoidance are moot points if there is no congestion in the network. -- Robert Blayzor INOC, LLC rblay...@inoc.net http://www.inoc.net/~rblayzor/ _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
