I actually got VXLAN working between 2 x 4431s in the end, regardless of what the Cisco site said. I guess what they mean is, "it will work on the 4431 but we will not support it". It's actually a cool protocol/feature, works well and fails over fast.
On Sun, 9 Dec 2018 at 14:40, Richard Clayton <sledge...@gmail.com> wrote: > Changed my lab to VXLAN only to find its not supported on the 4431, only > supported on the 4451. It lets you put all the commands in but doesn't > work, why do Cisco do that to us, surely just remove the commands when > there is no support for it? > > > https://www.cisco.com/c/en_in/products/collateral/routers/4000-series-integrated-services-routers-isr/datasheet-c78-732542.html > > > On Sat, 8 Dec 2018 at 10:27, Richard Clayton <sledge...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Config snippet from both routers >> >> CE R1 >> interface GigabitEthernet0/0/3 >> description POP1-CE02 3750SW-1 >> mtu 1600 >> no ip address >> media-type rj45 >> negotiation auto >> service instance 1 ethernet >> description L2 Extension LAN >> encapsulation dot1q 229,232 >> xconnect 100.66.50.110 100 encapsulation l2tpv3 pw-class L2TPv3 >> ! >> service instance 2 ethernet >> description Corporate L3 LAN >> encapsulation dot1q 700 >> rewrite ingress tag pop 1 symmetric >> bridge-domain 4 >> ! >> CE R2 >> interface GigabitEthernet0/0/3 >> description POP2-CE02 3750SW-1 >> mtu1600 >> no ip address >> negotiation auto >> service instance 1 ethernet >> description L2 Extension LAN >> encapsulation dot1q 229,232 >> xconnect 100.66.50.109 100 encapsulation l2tpv3 pw-class L2TPv3 >> ! >> service instance 2 ethernet >> description Corporate L3 LAN >> encapsulation dot1q 700 >> rewrite ingress tag pop 1 symmetric >> bridge-domain 4 >> ! >> ! >> >> On Fri, 7 Dec 2018 at 18:04, Richard Clayton <sledge...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> Hi Guys >>> >>> I have two main sites, HQ and DR, the site has layer 2 p2p between them >>> and a 4431 on each for the WAN. They want layer two backup over the 4431 >>> WAN circuits for their existing layer 2 p2p. >>> I have tested L2TPV3 xconnect inside LAN facing Service Instance, the >>> L2TPV3 session establishes, but is not passing and frames. My question. >>> Is L2TPV3 xconnect inside a Service Instance supported on 4431 IOS XE, or >>> do I need to change my lab to either OTV or VXLAN? >>> >>> I have the AppX license installed on both routers. >>> >>> Thanks in advance of you assistance. >>> >>> Rick >>> >> _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/