The amount of developers on the project has not changed since Cisco purchased Sourcefire. So it’s not from lack of work.
-- Joel Esler | Talos: Manager | jes...@cisco.com<mailto:jes...@cisco.com> On Dec 1, 2017, at 12:28 PM, G.W. Haywood <clamav-de...@jubileegroup.co.uk<mailto:clamav-de...@jubileegroup.co.uk>> wrote: Hi there, On Fri, 1 Dec 2017, pgndev wrote: I'm building clam 0.99.3/head, ... The build FAILs -- as it has for over a year -- when linking against OpenSSL 1.1.0x libs/api, due to reference of deprecated symbols, ... Mod'ing the build by applying changes similar to a 3rd-party patch ... also available for over a year now, ... and exec OK ... What's needed to get full OpenSSL 1.1.0 compat into master branch? Either a community with the will and the energy to fork it, or some kind of serious commitment to the project from Cisco/Sourcefire which wouldn't be so laughable for a company with over seventy thousand employees. Cisco figures, for anyone interested (Wikipedia/Cisco_Systems today): Revenue US$ 48.0 billion Net income US$ 9.6 billion Total assets US$ 129.8 billion It seems to me that Cisco, having taken what it wants from the project to use in things that it sells, would be very happy for it to die - but it can't be seen to just kill it, because that wouldn't look well. I'd love for them to show (*) me that I'm wrong. (*) Not tell. -- 73, Ged. _______________________________________________ http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-devel.html Please submit your patches to our Bugzilla: http://bugs.clamav.net http://www.clamav.net/contact.html#ml _______________________________________________ http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-devel.html Please submit your patches to our Bugzilla: http://bugs.clamav.net http://www.clamav.net/contact.html#ml