On Wed, April 21, 2010 11:08 am, Christopher X. Candreva wrote:
> On Wed, 21 Apr 2010, Bill Landry wrote:
>
>> Doesn't agree with the example you provided, is all I'm saying, not
>> without notification via "certified mail" or "personal delivery", which
>> takes notification to a much higher standard and requirement then you
>> have
>> been trying to justify.
>
> The example I sited shows a guy who lost his building and spent 10 years
> trying to get things fixed. In the course a law was changed, so that NOW,
> in
> New York State in the USA, personal delivery of notification is required.
>
> If you would like to assume from this that you are safe in your particular
> locality, I can only hope you don't wake up in a pile of rubble.
>
> For me, the lesson I take is to always be aware of the laws in your
> locality. And the policies of the software you use.

Oh yeah, and I bet you read the public notifications in your local paper
every day.  That's why the notification requirements are being reviewed in
most all jurisdictions and changed to require more stringent notification
standards.  Your position is untenable in today's world.

Bill



_______________________________________________
Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit http://wiki.clamav.net
http://www.clamav.net/support/ml

Reply via email to