On 16 Oct 2008, at 11:31 am, James Trankelson wrote:
... and when I would call it ([inst foo:0.001], for example), the
value inside the foo method would NOT be 0.001. At the time, I
believed there to be an Objective C requirement that parameters to
methods need to be pointers to objects, not primitive values. So, I
achieved success by changing the above method declaration to
-(void) foo:(NSNumber*)val { }
... and passing in a NSNumber* with a float value worked.
Now, I'm having the same problem, but am not convinced there is any
such requirement that parameters be pointers to object instances. (I
could be wrong, though)
You're not wrong, there is no such requirement. A glance at most Cocoa
classes will reveal methods with simple scalar parameters.
Others have addressed your current problem, but a note about the
problem of passing 0.001:
A float may not be able to exactly represent 0.001, but a value
somewhat close to it. When the debugger displays a value it is having
to do some internal conversion to generate the actual characters
displayed and there may be some rounding or other adjustment
occurring. Passing it in an NSNumber may appear to work because it
*maybe* storing the value internally as a double or in some other form
that subtly affects the rounding.
Whatever is happening, the fact is that floats cannot store numbers
arbitrarily precisely. It's obvious really - a float is 32 bits so no
matter how a value is encoded into those 32 bits, it can only
represent 2^32-1 possible discrete values.
--Graham
_______________________________________________
Cocoa-dev mailing list (Cocoa-dev@lists.apple.com)
Please do not post admin requests or moderator comments to the list.
Contact the moderators at cocoa-dev-admins(at)lists.apple.com
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/cocoa-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
This email sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
