On 12/9/09 2:49 PM, Laurent Daudelin said: >I guess that with Carbon not being ported to 64bits, >NSRunningApplication was needed. It just makes life a little harder if >you have to support both 10.5 (which doesn't have NSRunningApplication >but has Process Manager) and 10.6 (which has NSRunningApplication but >doesn't support Process Manager in 64bits)...
The Process Manager isn't even part of Carbon.framework, it's in ApplicationServices.h framework. It's lineage is pre-OS X of course. I think the idea of NSRunningApplication was more to fill holes in the Cocoa APIs and minimize 'impedance mismatch'. -- ____________________________________________________________ Sean McBride, B. Eng s...@rogue-research.com Rogue Research www.rogue-research.com Mac Software Developer Montréal, Québec, Canada _______________________________________________ Cocoa-dev mailing list (Cocoa-dev@lists.apple.com) Please do not post admin requests or moderator comments to the list. Contact the moderators at cocoa-dev-admins(at)lists.apple.com Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/cocoa-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com This email sent to arch...@mail-archive.com
