On Mar 8, 2012, at 4:57 PM, Quincey Morris wrote: > It wouldn't solve, e.g., the possibly inconsistency between 'array.count' and > a subsequent reference, unless it was coded to keep a "consistent" local > reference to the copy of the array, in which case you'd want the copy to be > explicit in the API so that a reader of the code would be aware, and that > would be a non-atomic-level approach anyway.
If the array that the client is using is an immutable array that was created by copying the object’s internal NSMutableArray, then array.count is not going to change. Charles _______________________________________________ Cocoa-dev mailing list (Cocoa-dev@lists.apple.com) Please do not post admin requests or moderator comments to the list. Contact the moderators at cocoa-dev-admins(at)lists.apple.com Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: https://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/cocoa-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com This email sent to arch...@mail-archive.com
