[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-8272?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15984553#comment-15984553
 ] 

Andrés de la Peña commented on CASSANDRA-8272:
----------------------------------------------

And [here are the 
dtests|https://github.com/riptano/cassandra-dtest/compare/master...adelapena:CASSANDRA-8272]
 reproducing the problem. They use 2 replicas instead of 3. Updates use 
consistency {{ONE}}, and byteman is used in one of the two nodes to simulate a 
long latency during index updates. Insertions and selections use consistency 
{{ALL}}.

Cassandra 2.1 doesn't use byteman so, if we are going to fix this version, we 
could either add the byteman dependency to 2.1 or modify [the way ccm loads the 
byteman jars|https://github.com/pcmanus/ccm/blob/master/ccmlib/node.py#L1609].

> 2ndary indexes can return stale data
> ------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: CASSANDRA-8272
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-8272
>             Project: Cassandra
>          Issue Type: Bug
>            Reporter: Sylvain Lebresne
>            Assignee: Andrés de la Peña
>             Fix For: 2.1.x
>
>
> When replica return 2ndary index results, it's possible for a single replica 
> to return a stale result and that result will be sent back to the user, 
> potentially failing the CL contract.
> For instance, consider 3 replicas A, B and C, and the following situation:
> {noformat}
> CREATE TABLE test (k int PRIMARY KEY, v text);
> CREATE INDEX ON test(v);
> INSERT INTO test(k, v) VALUES (0, 'foo');
> {noformat}
> with every replica up to date. Now, suppose that the following queries are 
> done at {{QUORUM}}:
> {noformat}
> UPDATE test SET v = 'bar' WHERE k = 0;
> SELECT * FROM test WHERE v = 'foo';
> {noformat}
> then, if A and B acknowledge the insert but C respond to the read before 
> having applied the insert, then the now stale result will be returned (since 
> C will return it and A or B will return nothing).
> A potential solution would be that when we read a tombstone in the index (and 
> provided we make the index inherit the gcGrace of it's parent CF), instead of 
> skipping that tombstone, we'd insert in the result a corresponding range 
> tombstone.  



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)

Reply via email to