[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-3459?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13144373#comment-13144373
]
Sylvain Lebresne commented on CASSANDRA-3459:
---------------------------------------------
Sorry for the dumb question, but is there any other motivation to remove the cf
name from the file name other than "we wouldn't *have* to anymore"?
Because even if we don't have to, I think it's still fairly convenient to have
it in the file name for all of the cases where you move some sstables out of
the initial repository. Or to reformulate, I'm fine with making it so that
Descriptor don't rely on the file name to decide from which CF the sstable are
for if that's what is proposed here, but I'd be in favor of keeping the file
name as it is unless we have a compelling reason not to.
> Remove CF name from SSTable file
> --------------------------------
>
> Key: CASSANDRA-3459
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-3459
> Project: Cassandra
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Reporter: Marcus Eriksson
> Priority: Minor
> Fix For: 1.1
>
>
> When CASSANDRA-2749 is done, it is unnecessary to keep the CF name in the
> filename of the sstable files (this is already in the directory name).
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
