[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-3782?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13202560#comment-13202560
 ] 

Sylvain Lebresne commented on CASSANDRA-3782:
---------------------------------------------

bq. I think it may be confusing that the user would need to specify values for 
exactly each part of the PK declaration

I suppose that's more a problem for CASSANDRA-3680. But actually it may be 
worth dealing with this at the same time we deal with CASSANDRA-3680. I 
initially wanted to separate the two issues because for non-composite wide rows 
we wouldn't really need to change anything to secondary indexes to support 
this. But now I'm a bit afraid that we'll do something here that is not 
coherent with CASSANDRA-3680.
                
> Secondary indexes support for wide rows in CQL 3.0
> --------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: CASSANDRA-3782
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-3782
>             Project: Cassandra
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>          Components: API
>            Reporter: Sylvain Lebresne
>            Assignee: Sylvain Lebresne
>             Fix For: 1.1
>
>
> Currently, CQL 3.0 doesn't allow creating an index on a dynamic CF (with 
> COMPACT STORAGE). The goal of this ticket is *not* to support the composite 
> case however (CASSANDRA-3680 will tackle this).
> I think changes needed to support this are only in the CQL side and covert 
> two area:
> * Finding a syntax for it
> * Currently, the CQL 3 code consider that a CF with any column_metadata 
> defined is a non-compact cf. Basically the problem is that we currently use 
> column_metadata both for defining a name for a column in the static case, and 
> store indexing information. Ideally, we would separate those informations, 
> i.e. we could add a new map valueAliases (ByteBuffer -> AbstractType) to 
> CFMetadata (only used by static CF) and we would keep column_metadata for 
> indexing purpose only. However that may be problematic for backward 
> compatibility (with thrift in particular), so probably instead we can just 
> add a new boolean isStaticColumnName to ColumnDefinition.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

        

Reply via email to