[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-9601?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13677218#comment-13677218
 ] 

Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-9601:
-----------------------------------

{color:red}-1 overall{color}.  Here are the results of testing the latest 
attachment 
  
http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12586526/HADOOP-9601-trunk-rebase.patch
  against trunk revision .

    {color:green}+1 @author{color}.  The patch does not contain any @author 
tags.

    {color:green}+1 tests included{color}.  The patch appears to include 1 new 
or modified test files.

    {color:red}-1 javac{color:red}.  The patch appears to cause the build to 
fail.

Console output: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/2611//console

This message is automatically generated.
                
> Support native CRC on byte arrays
> ---------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HADOOP-9601
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-9601
>             Project: Hadoop Common
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: performance, util
>    Affects Versions: 3.0.0
>            Reporter: Todd Lipcon
>            Assignee: Gopal V
>              Labels: perfomance
>         Attachments: HADOOP-9601-trunk-rebase.patch, 
> HADOOP-9601-WIP-01.patch, HADOOP-9601-WIP-02.patch
>
>
> When we first implemented the Native CRC code, we only did so for direct byte 
> buffers, because these correspond directly to native heap memory and thus 
> make it easy to access via JNI. We'd generally assumed that accessing byte[] 
> arrays from JNI was not efficient enough, but now that I know more about JNI 
> I don't think that's true -- we just need to make sure that the critical 
> sections where we lock the buffers are short.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

Reply via email to