On 1/18/02 3:40 AM, "Rey Francois" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Agreed, this is getting confusing. Let me reformulate the proposal, > this time for inclusion in the commons directly, and taking feedback > into account. The following section have been updated and need a new > reading: 1.5, 2, 2.1, and 4. > > Votes already received for inclusion in commons are: > Ted Husted +1 > Jason van Zyl +1 > David Winterfeldt +1 > > Votes already received for inclusion in the sandbox are: > Jeff Turner +1 > Scott Sanders +1 > The two people above should vote again if they mean inclusion in the > commons directly. I as +1 in sandbox a while ago :) Seems like you added a few people to the committer list to satisfy that requirement, so I guess +1 as a reg component as well. -- Geir Magnusson Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] System and Software Consulting "They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." - Benjamin Franklin _________________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
