On 2/3/02 10:53 PM, "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, 3 Feb 2002, Sam Ruby wrote: > >> On the other hand, if (hypothetically) Costin wanted to veto a change in >> axis that Glen Daniels (the most active committer at the present time) >> thought was important, I'm not sure what I would do. > > To add one more example - if a majority of axis commiters would believe > that tomcat is not ready to be released ( for example because it breaks > something that axis depends on ), should we release it ? Axis is > not even a jakarta project, but I think their opinion should be counted > in the vote count. > I think this is valid - users are certainly a equal participants in the community. However, I still thinks it falls to the 'developers' (and I don't only mean coders - I think everyone with the canonical 'committer' designation) to make the decision about what to do. They can ignore a part of their community, in this case the Axis developers, but that is of course at their own (and the project's) risk. geir -- Geir Magnusson Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] System and Software Consulting You're going to end up getting pissed at your software anyway, so you might as well not pay for it. Try Open Source. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
