> 3) your name has replaced mine as auther of the > smaller class, as i did > nothing really. > :-)) haha ....
> > 1) I hate the env.put() business of JNDI. Should we > also provide a > helper factory (optional use) that will make an > InitialContext for comon > types of transport? It would be a non-standard way > of making an initial > context but many people do this anyway in their > code. > Sure , sounds good . > 2) The URL naming scheme for JNDI is very different > to the colon > delimited design that I have started in > InterfaceLookupFactory. Should > we change that to look more like JNDI ? > Hey Paul, I left some println' hanging in there amongst the jndi code . Can you get rid of those. I am sorry for that . > 3) Tests. I think some of the tests should be > changed to use JNDI for > the lookup. Not all, as we should show people that > they have options... > Yaa , maybe we can have the sockete-client option, in to express JNDI presence within the altrmi story. :-) V i n a y. __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Try FREE Yahoo! Mail - the world's greatest free email! http://mail.yahoo.com/ -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
