On 6/6/02 3:47 PM, "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, 6 Jun 2002, Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote: > >>> Actually the default logger ( used if no 'real' logger is found ) >>> and the JDK1.4 adapter will have to remain in the main jar ( unless >>> we want to support an alternate impl. for JDK1.4 logging - is it >>> even possible ? ) >> >> Why would it have to remain? >> >> (I'll stop the xposting after this one and keep it on commons...) > > The 'simple' logger ? Because it's very possible ( even likley ) to > not find any other logger, and it's important to get at least something > on stderr to know that things don't work. It would be very bad to have > major errors but see nothing because a logger was not found. Plus for > simple apps you don't need a real logger. Sorry - was thinking about the jdk1.4. Agreed with the default stdout logger... > > For JDK1.4 ? I don't know, it seems it doesn't work otherwise, > probably I'm doing something wrong. > > Costin > > > > > > > -- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > -- Geir Magnusson Jr. Research & Development, Adeptra Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] +1-203-247-1713 -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
