It might take me till next weekend. V. James Turner wrote: > At 08:56 PM 9/29/2002, V. Cekvenich wrote: > >> As a non commiter I will only comment that I am very, very glad >> someone is finaly working on Validator, but I think it still has open >> issues including 8787. So far my client would used a patch up >> validator which I heard others do. >> >> 8787 is needed since it used for multi row validation and other master >> detail work. >> It has sample code. > > > I'm a bit confused here, what don't you think works with indexed field > validations as current. I've got several forms in applications using > base Validator (no patch) that work just fine with master/detail type > records. > > The intent is to either resolve or postpone all outstanding bugs against > Validator before it releases. This is an attempt to resolve 8787. Can > you give me an example of a form that you can't currently validate? > > James
-- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
