I'm fairly active on Jelly, so I could provide a snapshot build of the most recent changes. There are snapshots in the Maven repo too, although that snapshot may be a teensy bit stale.
It's too bad that Jelly + deps isn't GUMPified yet. GUMP is a very valuable process for keeping everybody's API on the same page. --- Stefan Bodewig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 18 Oct 2002, Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > cannot resolve symbol : class Jelly > > Houston we have a problem, Jelly is currently not > Gumpified (because > it depends on a lot of stuff that is not Gumpified > either and even > seemed to run into circular dependencies). > > Is there a stable binary of Jelly that Latka could > depend upon? Note > that Latka would lose the "there is an incompatible > API change" > warning mechanism of Gump if we allowed it to have > binary > dependencies. > > Stefan > > -- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > <mailto:commons-dev-unsubscribe@;jakarta.apache.org> > For additional commands, e-mail: > <mailto:commons-dev-help@;jakarta.apache.org> > ===== Morgan Delagrange http://jakarta.apache.org/taglibs http://jakarta.apache.org/commons http://axion.tigris.org http://jakarta.apache.org/watchdog __________________________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Faith Hill - Exclusive Performances, Videos & More http://faith.yahoo.com -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:commons-dev-unsubscribe@;jakarta.apache.org> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:commons-dev-help@;jakarta.apache.org>
