Yeah I'd say it is disturbing, I just wanted to highlight that the anonymous CVS access is not the only means of getting sandbox articles. Most of the discussion on this list with regards to this topic has been "What do we need to do to the source code to make it legal", judging from what I've read on reorg we need to a hell of a lot more to make it so.
-John K On Fri, 2002-10-25 at 14:39, Stefan Bodewig wrote: > On 25 Oct 2002, John Keyes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Some of the sandbox code is actually distributed as well. > > I'm pretty sure that storing it in a public CVS repo legally is > "distributing". One of the reasons that we (and the XML folks) have > been hunting and deleting jars in CVS. > > Stefan > > > -- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:commons-dev-unsubscribe@;jakarta.apache.org> > For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:commons-dev-help@;jakarta.apache.org> -- John Keyes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:commons-dev-unsubscribe@;jakarta.apache.org> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:commons-dev-help@;jakarta.apache.org>
